Athletes Overpaid 2 free essay sample

Melvin Garcia 07/19/2011 Written Analysis #3, Chapter 4 I. Introduction Thesis Statement: Professional athletes who perform solely for society’s entertainment are undeservingly overpaid for their talents. These highly skilled athletes contribute relatively little to making society better like many other Samaritan careers which are overlooked and poorly paid. These people are true role models, not athletes. Fans contribute highly to the athletes’ salaries. A. Major proposition or premise (before because): Professional athletes who perform solely for society’s entertainment are undeservingly overpaid for their talents B. st Minor proposition or premise (after because): C. These highly skilled athletes contribute relatively little to making society better like many other Samaritan careers which are overlooked and poorly paid. D. 2nd Minor proposition or premise These people are true role models, not athletes. E. 3rd Minor proposition or premise Fans contribute highl y to the athletes’ salaries. II. A. 1st Minor proposition/premise Professional athletes are undeservingly overpaid B. We will write a custom essay sample on Athletes Overpaid 2 or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Evidence: Expert Testimony: Ted Sherman Philosophical Theory: Karl Marx Historical Examples: Babe Ruth Statistics: Barry Zito Logic: Professional athletes are extremely overpaid. They are recognized for their performance in their careers. The better the athlete performs, the higher his salary whereas many other Samaritan careers are left unnoticed and unappreciated. C. Opposition of 1st minor proposition/premise Professional athletes excel at what they do and should be rewarded handsomely. It is purely for society’s self interest. D. Evidence: Expert Testimony: David Brown Philosophical Theory: Thomas Hobbes Historical Examples: Magic Johnson Statistics: Manny Pacquiao Logic: Professional athletes have a unique talent that no other individual have. That is what makes them extraordinary and they should be paid largely. Society is amazed by special talents performed on the field. F. Refutation of Opposition Premise: Playing sports is just a talent. No one benefits from athlete performing great on the field. This is simply entertainment to society. III. A. 2nd minor proposition/premise Many other careers that are underpaid are considered Samaritans and these people are true role models, not athletes. A. Evidence Expert Testimony: Ryan Gray Philosophical Theory: Fsk’s Guide to Reality Historical Examples: Gandhi Statistics: Charles Barkley Logic: People who serve in their jobs by helping others do not get paid as much as professional athletes. They are not recognized for the hard work they do such as saving lives or providing education. B. Opposition of 2nd minor proposition/premise People may choose whomever they please to be their role model(s) even athletes. D. Evidence Expert Testimony: Timothy Bernstein Philosophical Theory: Freedom of Choice/Speech Historical Examples: Lance Armstrong Statistics: Tiger Woods Logic: According to Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, everyone has their own opinions and point of views. Thus, who they choose as their role model should not matter to others. E. Refutation of Opposition Premise According to the American Heritage New Dictionary, role models are defined as person(s) who â€Å"serve as an example of the values, attitudes, and behaviors associated with a role† such as a doctor, teacher or firefighter etc. Athletes do not benefit others as much as these samaritan-like jobs thus should not be considered role models. IV. A. 3rd minor proposition/premise Many other careers are overlooked and poorly paid due to the fans’ contributions to athletes’ salries. B. Evidence: Expert Testimony: Jeffrey Guerrero Philosophical Theory: Sara Murray (Supply/Demand) Historical Examples: Mother Teresa Statistics: Tenzin Gyatso Logic: People who serve and actually benefit others as careers get paid merely pennies compared to athletes. C. Opposition of 3rd minor proposition/premise It is the fans who contribute to these athletes’ salaries by paying hundreds for tickets and/or fan merchandise. D. Evidence Expert Testimony: Emma Riley Sutton Philosophical Theory: Stockholm Syndrome Historical Examples: Michael Jordan Statistics: Pope John Logic: Fans willingly pay large amount of money to watch and support these athletes. It is plainly for self-pleasure of the fans. E. Refutation of Opposition Premise Professional athletes do not help humankind nor do they save lives. Their actions in their careers are not as heroic. V. Conclusion Professional athletes should be paid at a negotiable rate even with fans’ contributions. However, when their salaries reach millions of dollars or even billions, it is quite bizarre for a human to be paid that much for performing a unique talent. Other Samaritan careers should be paid higher for helping humankind and/or saving actual lives, and these people are the true role models of society.

Free Essays on Dr. Faustus

but little depth. As one looks at the little detail presented, and at the broad spectrum of his desires, it is easy to infer that Faustus has little real understanding either of magic or his desires. The second definition of conceit implies that the word is synonymous with fantasy. So one can then infer that Faustus is filled with this fanciful notion that is magic. â€Å"Resolve me of all ambiguities [†¦] and search all the corners of the new found world,† (Marlowe 1.1.81-85). His vague desires and huge expectations of magic as a device seem to make more sense if one looks at the idea Faustus is overcome by fantasy. Unfortunately the meaning of the work within the speech comes not only from its definition, but also form the context in ... Free Essays on Dr. Faustus Free Essays on Dr. Faustus In the last scene, the Devils carry Faustus into Hell after he fails to repent and ask God for forgiveness. The quest or thirst for knowledge leads Faustus on a slow decent into the depths of Hell. In order to understand the criticisms used by Marlow, one must first understand the period in which this piece was composed. Scholars who studied anything but the Bible where regarded as having hubris. Nowadays people view the quest for knowledge as noble and honorable. Intellects and scholars are considered necessary to our society and are usually well respected. The central criticism used throughout the play emphasizes the idea of an â€Å"unhealthy quest for knowledge†. This need for knowledge justifies the reason the whole play. Marlow’s criticism is church friendly, he agrees with the extremely powerful church. When this play was written in 1590, the church controlled everything, and they were the absolute authority. It was common practice in the middle ages that at any coronation, that the Cardinal or Pope would place the crown upon the head of the King or Queen, it was a powerful symbol of how even the power of the King came from God. Marlow had to deal with the intellectually and spiritually confining church. He wrote about what he could which was a religious play. Marlow sort of acts as the Church’s critic, he ends up condemning Faustus to Hell, after he signs a deal with the devil. The deal says that Faustus will be given twenty fours years of power and delight in exchange for his soul. The Good Angel and Evil Angel argue with Faustus whether or not to sign the pact with Lucifer. This is an example of one of the many chances that the good Doctor is given to repent and serve God. Faustus serves as an example to all watching the play, that you must repent now and throw yourself on the mercy of God. This is a universal teaching of the Church and Marlow was a member of the Church. He would more than likely insert this religiou... Free Essays on Dr. Faustus Dr. Faustus tells the story of a middle-aged man who, disillusioned by the futility and restraint of life, rejects reason and God in favor of the power supplied by the Devil. This descent calls into question the reason for the disillusionment and the damning choice of Diabolism. Certain words and specific thematic elements, within Dr. Faustus, provide an insight into the mind of the character. Dr. Faustus staunchly rejects his old beliefs of God, yet they still permeate his thoughts as seen through his speech and treatment of magic. His descent into darkness is not a passage into evil but tragic path of self-destruction. In the very beginning of Faustus’ speech he says, â€Å"How I am glutted with conceit of this,† (Marlowe 1.1.79). The word conceit in this instance elicits several meanings, two in particular will be investigated and their validity within the speech shown. The first meaning of conceit deals with the idea of understanding. Faustus, then, is full with the understanding of magic and its capabilities. Ultimately, though, he simply wants magic to satisfy his desires, as he goes on to describe in many words but little depth. As one looks at the little detail presented, and at the broad spectrum of his desires, it is easy to infer that Faustus has little real understanding either of magic or his desires. The second definition of conceit implies that the word is synonymous with fantasy. So one can then infer that Faustus is filled with this fanciful notion that is magic. â€Å"Resolve me of all ambiguities [†¦] and search all the corners of the new found world,† (Marlowe 1.1.81-85). His vague desires and huge expectations of magic as a device seem to make more sense if one looks at the idea Faustus is overcome by fantasy. Unfortunately the meaning of the work within the speech comes not only from its definition, but also form the context in ... Free Essays on Dr. Faustus DOCTOR FAUSTUS AS A MORALITY PLAY Doctor Faustus has many features of a morality play: the conflict between good and evil, the creation of Good and Bad Angels, the Old Man as Good Counsel, the pageant of the Seven Deadly Sins and the appearance of Faustus’ enemies to ambush and kill him. The conflict between Good and Evil was a recurring theme in the medieval morality plays. From this point of view, Marlowe’s play is a dramatization of the medieval morality play, Everyman. Doctor Faustus becomes a morality play in which heaven struggles for the soul of a Renaissance Everyman, namely Doctor Faustus. The Good Angel and the Bad Angel are characters derived from the medieval morality plays like The Castle of Perseverance. They are sometimes regarded as an externalization of the thoughts of Faustus. This is a twentieth-century view. The Angels are independent absolutes, one wholly good and one wholly evil. They appear in Doctor Faustus like allegorical figures of a morality play. They reflect the possibility of both damnation and redemption being open to Faustus. A close examination shows that the Evil Angel declines in importance as the play advances. The angles work by suggestion, as allegorical characters in morality plays do. The audience also observes the pageant of the Seven Deadly Sins in Doctor Faustus. This is another feature borrowed by Marlowe from the tradition of the morality play. In Marlowe’s play, to divert Faustus’ attention from Christ, his savior, Lucifer, comes with his attendant devils to rebuke him for invoking Christ and then presents the pageant of the Seven Deadly Sins as a diversion. Benvolio’s attempts to ambush and take revenge on Faustus is also a device taken from the medieval morality play. Faustus loses his head, only for it to be revealed as a false one. This theatrical device was originally used in the medieval morality play, Mankin...